The first relaxing holiday reading that I discovered was Lauren Grodstein's A Friend of the Family
The intelligent, successful woman Peter really loved did not want him, so he settles into a conventional and convenient marriage with a woman who is kind of OK but does not awaken any profound emotions on his part. He lives his entire life with this woman who only has sex because it makes for a "healthy marriage" and who only needs him around to pay bills and look good to her neighbors. His career goes pretty well, but, once again, it is far from being what he imagined.
As a result, he channels his unspent emotions into an obsessive fixation on his son Alec. Alec is a gifted artist and wants to live in a way that would allow him to develop his gift. His father, however, has different plans for him. Peter expects Alec to serve the purpose of validating his existence. He wants his son to graduate from college, find a job, get married, move to the suburbs, and start producing grandchildren for him. When Peter discovers that Alec has a different vision of his own life, he goes into an uncontrollable rage.
Peter sees himself as a great father, even though he is completely incapable of recognizing his son's right to have his own dreams, beliefs, opinions, and wishes. The following dialogue between Peter and his wife reveals the exact nature of Peter's fixation on Alec: "'Pete, would you want Alec married and miserable for your sake, or happy and alone for his?' 'Married and miserable,' I said." Peter keeps asking himself why his son cannot just be "obedient," just like his father. He never stops to question himself, however, about how much happiness his life of following the rules and being obedient brought him.
In general, Grodstein is not an extremely strong writer. She did, however, manage to tap into the reality of a horrifyingly invasive and obsessively destructive parenthood. I really enjoyed reading this novel because it rings very true in this respect. It is truly scary to realize that there are many parents like Peter around us.
* According to the survey I posted recently, people prefer me to write things other than book reviews. However, the book reviews bring the greatest number of visitors to the blog. Which is another incomprehensible mystery I am facing today.
** I can't believe I don't have to wait for books to go into the paperback edition any more. I spent years waiting for the books I really wanted to read to become available at a reasonable price. Now, thanks to the Kindle prices, I can buy them the day when they come out. And if you think I talk about the Kindle too much, wait until you get one, and then you'll understand.
7 comments:
Simon and Schuster is trying to end the practice of books coming to the Kindle as soon as they are released in hardcover:
http://www.examiner.com/x-12973-Long-Island-Books-Examiner~y2009m12d10-Simon--Schuster-to-delay-eReleases-four-months-from-Hardcover-publication
I expect other publishers will follow suit.
-Mike
God, what is the problem these jerks have????
I do not need these bad news on the last day of the semester, Mike.
I don't agree with your comments' about Lauren Grodstein at all. How could she not be a strong writer if she's able to describe this character so well? In addition, your description of the book isn't even accurate...
It's not a 'description", it's a reading. And a reading cannot be 'accurate" or not. It's my own. You are welcome to suggest your reading.
I say the writer isn't strong because her narrative techniques are conventional and her language is uninspiring. Some fairly lengthy episodes seem extraneous to the plot. Some things are annoyingly sensationalist. The novel is very unoriginal in places.
Creating one good character is not enough to qualify as a strong writer from my point of view.
But I'm grateful for your comment because it always makes me happy to see comments to my reviews.
I'm surprised you don't mention the character of Laura in your review. She is pretty central to the book.
I think she is a boring, one-dimensional character who has very little significance for the story. All she did was add a sensationalist aspect to the novel.
I'm beginning to doubt that you even read the book. Laura is the main cause of the conflict between father and son. None of this would have happened if it weren't for her. How can you say she had no significance to the story???
Post a Comment